Local (San Francisco) Propositions
Yes on A –
Authorizes the issuance of $887,400,000 in general obligation bonds to earthquake retrofit
Charter Amendments
No on B – Establishing Affordable Housing Fund Using Set-Asides from Property Taxes:
Creates a baseline appropriation and set-aside equivalent to $0.025 on each $100 of assessed property tax valuation for the next 15 years to support affordable housing programs. Ultimately, could cost up to $2.3 billion – with all the housing dedicated to low- and very low-income people, providing little opportunity for working families to benefit.
No on C – Prohibiting City Employees from Serving on Charter Boards and Commissions:
Prohibits, except for specified positions, city employees from serving on Charter-created boards and commissions. There is no apparent reason to limit eligibility when the Board of Supervisors can reject a mayoral appointee.
Yes on D – Financing Pier 70 Waterfront District Development Plan upon Board of Supervisors’ Approval:
Creates a Pier 70 improvement district to preserve and restore historic buildings, make seismic upgrades, clean up toxics and fund parks and maritime facilities. Authorizes the city to appropriate General Fund revenues in an amount up to 75 percent of the projected hotel and payroll taxes attributable to new development.
No on E – Changing the Number of Signatures Required to
Would double the number of signatures required to petition for recall of a member of the Board of Supervisors by increasing the number to 20 percent of the voters in the district, greatly reducing the opportunity for voters to recall a supervisor.
No on F – Holding all
Moves all elections of city officials to even-numbered years. Also, specifies that any person appointed to fill a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors with more than two years remaining on a term who is then elected to fill the balance of the term has served one of the person’s allowable two terms. No major American city holds mayoral campaigns in even years because of the danger of the race being overshadowed by concurrent campaigns for President and US Senate.
Yes on G – Allowing Retirement System Credit for Unpaid Parental Leave:
Allows police and firefighters taking unpaid parental leave to buy back the time as total years of city service for retirement purposes. No cost to the city, and will help attract and retain public safety employees.
No on H – Setting Renewable Energy Goals; Options for Providing Electric Power; Changing Revenue Bond Authority to Pay for Public Utility Facilities:
Grants authority to six members of the Board of Supervisors to municipalize electricity distribution in
No on I – Creating the Office of an Independent Rate-Payer Advocate:
Creates an independent rate-payer advocate appointed by the City Administrator to analyze and comment on rate proposals prepared by the SF Public Utilities Commission. Services to be paid from revenues of the utility rates that are the subject matter of those services.
No on J – Creating a Historic Preservation Commission:
Establishes a seven-member Historic Preservation Commission to replace the Landmarks Board. New commission would have the power to recommend landmark designations and historic district designations, certificates of appropriateness for work on landmark structures and amendments to the Preservation Element of the General Plan – powers that currently rest with the Planning Commission. Adds a layer of bureaucracy that could increase uncertainty in the building-permit process, and does not balance other planning priorities in the permitting process.
Ordinances
No on K – Changing the Enforcement of Laws Related to Prostitution and Sex Workers:
Attempts to illegally circumvent state law by prohibiting legal action against prostitutes. May encourage sex trafficking and other violent crimes.
Yes on L – Funding the
Authorizes the creation of the
No on M – Changing the Residential Rent Ordinance to Prohibit Specific Acts of Harassment of Tenants by Landlords:
Provides for both criminal and civil cause of action against landlords for “harassment,” including failure to perform a repair, abuse of a landlord’s right to access a unit, threats by word or gesture and other repeated acts or omissions designed to encourage a tenant to vacate a unit. Can expose landlords to unfounded complaints and litigation.
No on N – Changing Real Property Transfer Tax Rates:
Increases the real property transfer tax rate from .75 percent to 1.5 percent if property value exceeds $5 million, and reduces the tax on residential property transfers by up to 1/3 if, after January 1, 2009, transferor has installed an active solar system or made seismic retrofitting improvements.
Yes on O – Replacing the Emergency Response Fee with a General Tax (Access Line Tax) and Revising the Telephone Users Tax:
Ratifies and approves the city’s existing 911 tax and telephone tax. If the measure does not pass, the city would risk losing between $85 and $90 million in annual revenue.
Yes on P – Changing the Composition of the
Replaces the 11- member SFTA board with five members: all of which must be elected officials: The Mayor and a designee, the President of the Board of Supervisors and a designee, and the Treasurer. The measure also makes it city policy to, to the extent feasible, merge SFTA’S functions into existing city departments.
Yes on Q – Modifying the Payroll Expense Tax:
Extends the 1.5 percent payroll tax to pass-through entities and shareholders of professional corporations for work or services performed in the city, excluding return on capital. Contains a 200 percent formula cap based on the average wages of the top 25 percent of a firm’s wage earners as a “safe harbor” to calculate the tax due. Also includes an expanded small business exemption for businesses with payrolls of less than $250,000.
Yes on R – Renaming the
Another chance by the City to "stick it" to Dubya!
Yes on S – Policy Regarding Budget Set-Asides and Identification of Replacement Funds:
Makes it city policy that new set-asides or other mandated levels of spending must identify a funding source, limits the duration and any annual growth in the set-aside or mandated level of spending. Requires city controller’s analysis of the fiscal impact of any proposed new set-aside. Make everyone accountable!
No on T – Free and Low-Cost Substance Abuse Treatment Programs:
Prohibits the reduction of funding, staffing or the number of substance-abuse treatment slots so long as there is excess demand for the slots. No funding source identified for the additional cost of the program.
Declarations of Policy
Neutral on U – Policy against Funding for Deployment of Armed Forces in
Makes it official
Yes on V – Policy against Terminating Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) Programs in Public High Schools:
Makes it city policy, though not binding on the school district, to offer voluntary extracurricular JROTC programs and to reverse the action by the Board of Education to terminate the program.
Board of Supervisors
District One (Richmond)
Sue Lee | Planning Commissioner
District Three (North Beach, Telegraph Hill, Financial District, Nob Hill)
Claudine Cheng | Former National President, Organization of Chinese Americans
District Four (Sunset, Parkside)
Carmen Chu | Incumbent Supervisor
District Seven (Parkside, Golden Gate Heights, Clarendon Heights, Twin Peaks, Forest Knolls, Midtown Terrace, Forest Hill, Miraloma Park, Sunnyside, Sherwood Forest, Westwood Highlands, Westwood Park, St. Francis Wood, Monterey Heights, Mt. Davidson, Balboa Terrace, Ingleside Terrace, Stonestown, Lakeside, Lake Shore, Merced Manor, Park Merced, Lake Merced, City College, San Francisco State)
Sean Elsbernd | Incumbent Supervisor
District Eleven (Excelsior, Ingleside, Oceanview, Merced Heights, Ingleside Heights, Mission Terrace, Outer Mission, Crocker Amazon)
Myrna Lim | Former Planning Commissioner
Yes on 1A – SAFE, RELIABLE HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER TRAIN BOND ACT.
Yes on 2 – STANDARDS FOR CONFINING FARM ANIMALS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
Yes on 3 – CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOND ACT. GRANT PROGRAM. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
Yes on 4 – WAITING PERIOD AND PARENTAL NOTIFICATION BEFORE TERMINATION OF MINOR’S PREGNANCY. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Yes on 5 – NONVIOLENT DRUG OFFENSES. SENTENCING, PAROLE AND REHABILITATION. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
No on 6 – POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDING. CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND LAWS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
No on 7 – RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
No on 8 – ELIMINATES RIGHT OF SAME–SEX COUPLES TO MARRY.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
No on 9 - CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. VICTIMS’ RIGHTS. PAROLE.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE.
No on 10 - ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGY.
BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
No on 11 - REDISTRICTING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE.
Yes on 12 - VETERANS’ BOND ACT OF 2008.
Posts
